I met Aliette de Bodard's first book when my life went pearshaped, this time last year. I'd forgotten that until I re-read what I had to say about it. I liked it, but I didn't love it. It was more than competently written. It was simply not my cup of tea. The world it was set in was fascinating, however, and definitely one I wanted to watch.
De Bodard's new book, Harbinger of the Storm, is more to my taste. Her characterisation has improved (though still not as deep as I like) and her world just as fascinating. What makes this book so much more fun is that the palpable fear starts early on and that it's not based on splashing blood or nightmares. It's based on one character knowing just how thin the ice is upon which all the others are skating and yet not being able to stop more and more of them pouring onto the frozen lake to show off their ice dancing skills. That was a bad metaphor. There is no ice in this novel. It's all Aztecs.
The focus was still on the mystery rather than the fantasy, but this time I was prepared for it and I enjoyed it.
De Bodard is dangerously addictive. She still writes books about men, but the position of women (and the potential for their lives) is clearer in this novel. Also that de Bodard is doing what she said she was (in her comment on my previous review) - she is very sympathetic to women in fiction, and yet is writing about a culture that is aggressively male - she understands the conflict and handles it better in this novel. What I said in my answer to her comment* still holds, too "If you're being true to the base culture and there is no equality in it, then writing a man's book is a good approach, because it leaves the female reader a place to read from without being diminished."
I would very much like to see de Bodard's work in a different culture because I want to see how she handles women n a framework where women have more options and where one doesn't have to break out of the social norms to create a strong female character, but I also want to read more of her Aztec books.
The reason I want to read more of them is pretty important. De Bodard is developing a very nice way of describing peoples' interface with their religious life. She uses actual belief as a basis for the fantasy elements. This is wonderful. It assumes that the stuff that entails deep belief is real. From this assumption flows the understanding that, if it's real, then religious ritual may be all that saves mankind. And this is the heart of the novel. What we do, matters. In that way, it's not just a mystery, it's about Mystery.** Where the numinous touches our world and what happens when it roams uncontrolled.
* am I always this recursive? I blame the cookbook, which was all about me finding out what I did and what the people I worked with did
** Sorry, Medievalism outs itself. The Mystery Plays are important to me and tend to creep into my mind when someone raises the relationship between religion and ordinary life.***
*** Not that the Mystery Plays have anything to do with my own religious belief. I am modern and Jewish, not Medieval and Christian.****
****This last footnote is purely to plague
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)